Airflow Executors Explained
If you're new to Apache Airflow, the world of Executors is difficult to navigate. Even if you're a veteran user overseeing 20+ DAGs, knowing what Executor best suits your use case at any given time isn't black and white - especially as the OSS project (and its utilities) continues to grow and develop.
This guide will do 3 things:
We'll give the Sequential Executor an honorable mention, too.
Once a DAG is defined (perhaps with the help of an Operator), the following needs to happen in order for a single or set of "tasks" within that DAG to execute and be completed from start to finish:
failed, etc) behind the scenes.
The difference between executors comes down to the resources they have at hand and how they choose to utilize those resources to distribute work (or not distribute it at all).
When we're talking about task execution, you'll want to be familiar with these somewhat confusing terms, all of which we call "Environment Variables." The terms themselves have changed a bit over Airflow versions, but this list is compatible with 1.10.
airflow.cfg(or directly through Astronomer's UI) and encompass everything from email alerts to DAG concurrency (see below).
worker_concurrency: This determines how many tasks each worker can run at any given time. The CeleryExecutor for example, will by default run a max of 16 tasks concurrently. Think of it as "How many tasks each of my workers can take on at any given time." This number will naturally be limited by
dag_concurrency. If you have 1 worker and want it to match your deployment's capacity, workerconcurrency = parallelism. `ENV AIRFLOWCELERYWORKERCONCURRENCY=9`
Note: In our experience, parallelism and concurrency are somewhat co-dependent. We'd encourage you to keep them in line with one another.
parsing_processes: This determines how many linear scheduling processes the scheduler can handle in parallel at any given time. The default value is 2, but adjusting this number gives you some control over CPU usage - the higher the value, the more resources you'll need.
Note: In Airflow 1.10.13 and prior versions, this setting is called max_threads.
Note: Rather than trying to find one set of configurations that work for all jobs, we'd recommend grouping jobs by their type as much as you can.
Running Apache Airflow on a LocalExecutor exemplifies single-node architecture.
The LocalExecutor completes tasks in parallel that run on a single machine (think: your laptop, an EC2 instance, etc.) - the same machine that houses the Scheduler and all code necessary to execute. A single LocalWorker picks up and runs jobs as they’re scheduled and is fully responsible for all task execution.
In practice, this means that you don't need resources outside of that machine to run a DAG or a set of DAGs (even heavy workloads). For example, you might hear: "We are running the LocalExecutor for development on a t3.xlarge AWS EC2 instance."
When you should use it
The LocalExecutor is ideal for testing.
The obvious risk is that if something happens to your machine, your tasks will see a standstill until that machine is back up.
Heavy Airflow users whose DAGs run in production will find themselves migrating from LocalExecutor to CeleryExecutor after some time, but you'll find plenty of use cases out there written by folks that run quite a bit on a LocalExecutor before making the switch. How much that executor can handle fully depends on your machine's resources and configuration. Until all resources on the server are used, the LocalExecutor actually scales up quite well.
At its core, Airflow's CeleryExecutor is built for horizontal scaling.
Celery itself is a way of running python processes in a distributed fashion. To optimize for flexibility and availability, the CeleryExecutor works with a "pool" of independent workers across which it can delegate tasks, via messages. On Celery, your deployment's scheduler adds a message to the queue and the Celery broker delivers it to a Celery worker (perhaps one of many) to execute.
If a worker node is ever down or goes offline, the CeleryExecutor quickly adapts and is able to assign that allocated task or tasks to another worker.
If you're running native Airflow, adopting a CeleryExecutor means you'll have to set up an underlying database to support it (RabbitMQ/Redis). If you're running on Astronomer, the switch really just means your deployment will be a bit heavier on resources (and price) - and that you'll likely have to keep a closer eye on your workers.
Note: When running Celery on top of a managed Kubernetes service, if a node that contains an Celery Worker goes down, Kubernetes will reschedule the work. When the pod comes back up, it'll reconnect to Redis and continue processing tasks.
Worker Termination Grace Period
An Airflow deployment on Astronomer running with Celery Workers has a setting called "Worker Termination Grace Period" (otherwise known as the "Celery Flush Period") that helps minimize task disruption upon deployment by continuing to run tasks for an x number of minutes (configurable via the Astro UI) after you push up a deploy.
Conversely, under LocalExecutor, tasks will start immediately upon deployment regardless of whether or not tasks were mid-execution, which could be disruptive.
When you should use it
While the LocalExecutor is a great way to save on engineering resources for testing even with a heavy workload, we generally recommend going with Celery for running DAGs in production, especially if you're running anything that's time sensitive.
KubernetesExecutor leverages the power of Kubernetes for resource optimization.
KubernetesExecutor relies on a fixed single Pod that dynamically delegates work and resources. For each and every task that needs to run, the Executor talks to the Kubernetes API to dynamically launch Pods which terminate when that task is completed.
This means a few things:
For each individual task, you can for the first time configure the following:
Note: The Kubernetes Executor is available on Astronomer and does not require that you have your own Kubernetes environment. To try it out, get in touch with us.
Scale to Near-Zero
With the Local and Celery Executors, a deployment whose DAGs run once a day will operate with a fixed set of resources for the full 24 hours - only 1 hour of which actually puts those resources to use. That's 23 hours of resources you're paying for but don't deliver.
On Astronomer, your Webserver and Scheduler costs will remain fixed even if you use the KubernetesExecutor, but the dynamic scaling of the actual pods will allow you to shed the fixed cost that comes with having a Celery Worker up 24 hours a day.
Less work for your Scheduler
On the Local and Celery Executors, the Scheduler is charged with constantly having to check the status of each task at all times from the Postgres backend - "Is it running? Queued? Failed?"
With the KubeExecutor, the workers (pods) talk directly to the same Postgres backend as the Scheduler and can to a large degree take on the labor of task monitoring. In this architecture, a task failure is handled by its individual Pod. The Scheduler is only responsible for keeping an eye on the pods themselves and take action if one or more of them fail.
Via the Kubernetes "Watcher" API, the scheduler reads event logs for anything with a failed label tied to that Airflow instance. If a pod fails, the Scheduler alerts Postgres and bubbles that failure up to the user to trigger whatever alerting solution is set up on your deployment.
When you should use it
The Kubernetes Executor offers extraordinary capabilities. If you're familiar with Kubernetes and want to give it a shot, we'd highly recommend doing so to be at the forefront of the modern Apache Airflow configuration.
Note: If you have a high quantity of tasks that are intended to finish executing particularly quickly, note the extra handful of seconds it takes for each individual Pod to spin up might slow those tasks down.
Sequential Executor: The Sequential Executor runs a single task instance at a time in a linear fashion with no parallelism functionality (A → B → C). It does identify a single point of failure, making it helpful for debugging. Otherwise, the Sequential Executor is not recommended for any use cases that require more than a single task execution at a time.
Do Airflow the easy way.